Court denies California’s bid to halt Riverside sheriff’s recount of 2025 election ballots - CalMatters

CalMatters
March 24, 2026
3 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

A California court rejected the state's attempt to block Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bigelow from recounting 2025 election ballots, allowing the audit to proceed.

How This Affects You

The court's decision permits a sheriff-led ballot recount in Riverside County, raising questions about how election audits and recounts are conducted in your county and whether local officials can override state oversight.

AI Summary

A California court has rejected an attempt by the state to block Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bigelow from conducting a recount of 2025 election ballots. The decision allows the sheriff's office to proceed with its audit of the ballots, which had been challenged by state officials who questioned the legality or necessity of the recount. The ruling represents a setback for California's effort to halt the count and suggests courts may be deferring to local election officials on recount procedures. The outcome could influence how other counties handle post-election audits and recounts in the state. The specifics of which races or precincts are being recounted and the sheriff's stated rationale for the audit were not detailed in available reporting.

What's Being Done

The Riverside County Sheriff's office is proceeding with its ballot recount following the court's rejection of California's bid to halt it.

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

Court blocks California effort to stop Republican sheriff’s ballot recount
Politics

Court blocks California effort to stop Republican sheriff’s ballot recount

<p>Riverside county sheriff had last month seized more than 650,000 ballots cast in the state’s November special election</p><p>California’s attorney general, Rob Bonta, is seeking a court order to stop the Riverside county sheriff’s department from continuing its recount of ballots from the November 2025 special election.</p><p>The LA Times <a href="https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-03-24/state-ag-takes-riverside-county-sheriff-to-court-over-seized-ballots">reports</a> that Bonta filed a petition with the fourth appellate district on Monday, writing that “the Sheriff’s misguided investigation threatens to sow distrust and jeopardize public confidence” in upcoming elections.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/24/california-attorney-general-rob-bonta-ballot-recounting">Continue reading...</a>

The Guardian US NewsMar 25
Court denies appeal to stop Riverside County Sheriff's election probe
Government Transparency

Court denies appeal to stop Riverside County Sheriff's election probe

A California sheriff running for governor has seized more than half a million ballots cast in a November special election from county election officials, saying he's investigating a ballot count discrepancy.

CBS NewsMar 25
California sheriff running for governor seizes more than a half million ballots from 2025 election - CNN
Politics

California sheriff running for governor seizes more than a half million ballots from 2025 election - CNN

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMif0FVX3lxTFBEMjByeGFrbmFwcTZyamYwcUMyRURkTWVZbURwVU96MEVsdDh5QzZ0TXExRnZTYnJNNm9ZX3dYMHNtaWFTdk9FUEU4bVZYMTg0cGxPVEVralJrOU1NcUhCaDd2MzNVSzRRWktZVjRwWEZqNEY3bGducE9sRGFSOW8?oc=5" target="_blank">California sheriff running for governor seizes more than a half million ballots from 2025 election</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">CNN</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2o1bWJqZ0VCRzVXalFTRlpRbHVpZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>

CNNMar 22
California sheriff seizes 650,000 ballots in defiance of state officials over election count dispute - New York Post
Politics

California sheriff seizes 650,000 ballots in defiance of state officials over election count dispute - New York Post

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiqwFBVV95cUxPT0hQNGlIZXNOemtBMXJlOWRrMmtHZ3Z4bnEwc3MzY3lzdlZIRDY0Y2J0QkIzcWVrZS1YR2gwSXUyRkhHa0lENWFsRXpsS2E0STY2WkpadzFIMU1BVENUR2VKa1ktY2lnbWJDVjF1SUdRcFczUlJHSVFHa211ZVZ5MERhaVAyWkJFRmpVUlhvcEREV3I0SlBWYnBEOGdudk82bUJPSmtndU5BQU0?oc=5" target="_blank">California sheriff seizes 650,000 ballots in defiance of state officials over election count dispute</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">New York Post</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2o1bWJqZ0VCR0NEXzBDYmFha2JTZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>

New York PostMar 22
US Supreme Court conservatives lean toward Republican bid to limit mail-in voting - Reuters
Politics

US Supreme Court conservatives lean toward Republican bid to limit mail-in voting - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMisgFBVV95cUxOX3JjeWJJX2dwT2dRbmFSck42Rmt5T045VWotRGtxZklSU1FmVTMxQVBmZnZTaGhyaGI4SnN0azRZdWU4ZDBrMVpYcHZTN3hkUGo0T2Y5SnZ6d1ltc29xN2hycU1oTHFQcGJDUnZTWE9JTG9pSzJWRlpSRnZiX3pXWV82Y2dkWjkyYllJWS1qcFhZY2NTa19xTTZrTzFYNnd4MmoybXI0dUc5X3JiOXE3ZUFn?oc=5" target="_blank">US Supreme Court weighs Republican bid to limit mail-in voting</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 23
Supreme Court won’t hear Texas death row inmate’s bid for DNA testing again
Civil Rights

Supreme Court won’t hear Texas death row inmate’s bid for DNA testing again

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed’s fight for DNA testing nearly three years after allowing his bid to prove his innocence to move forward, a move that paves the way for his execution.   Reed was convicted and sentenced to death over the 1996 murder of Stacey…

The HillMar 23
Read Next
The Case That Could Upend Who Gets to Be an American Is Back at the Supreme Court
Politics

The Case That Could Upend Who Gets to Be an American Is Back at the Supreme Court

Next week, the Trump administration’s bid to deny birthright citizenship to the US-born children of undocumented immigrants and non-green card holders through an executive order will arrive at the Supreme Court—yet again. Last year, the justices didn’t address the constitutionality of the order directly; instead, they ruled on a procedural question to limit the power […]

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources