Voting rights activists sue over DOJ state voter list requests
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
Voting rights activists are suing the Trump administration over Department of Justice requests for state voter lists.
How This Affects You
This lawsuit could impact your voter privacy and the integrity of voter rolls by challenging how the government collects election information.
AI Summary
Voting rights activists filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Tuesday regarding its requests for state voter lists. The activists allege these efforts by the Department of Justice are an attempt to "take over and subvert" the upcoming November midterm elections. This legal challenge comes as the DOJ seeks election information on individuals nationwide, reportedly in response to President Trump’s calls to "nationalize" such data. The lawsuit highlights concerns that the administration's actions could undermine electoral integrity and voter privacy.
What's Being Done
Voting rights activists have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's Department of Justice.
Following this story?
Get notified when new coverage appears
This article is part of a story we're tracking:
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
Government TransparencyJudge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information
A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states. Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to…
PoliticsVirginia’s redistricting vote ‘a critical step’ for the swing state
<p>Purple state which recently elected a Democratic governor will now choose whether to replace existing voting maps with ones that favor Democrats</p><p>Nearly three months to the day after his term as Virginia’s governor ended, Republican Glenn Youngkin stood in an unshaded corner of an office parking lot to warn<strong> </strong>dozens of conservative activists that they were in the midst of “the most important election” in the commonwealth’s 237-year history.</p><p>The question before the voters casting ballots at an early voting precinct a few yards away in the city of Leesburg ahead of Tuesday’s special election was whether to temporarily set aside Virginia’s congressional maps intended to advantage neither party and replace them with a new version that could allow Democrats to win all but one seat in the 11-member delegation in the November midterm elections.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/19/virginias-map-redistricting-vote-swing-state">Continue re...
Civil RightsFederal judge dismisses DOJ lawsuit seeking personal details about Rhode Island voters
U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy sided with Rhode Island's top election officials and civil rights advocates, writing that federal law does not permit the U.S. Department of Justice "to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here."
PoliticsTrump wants to stop states from regulating AI. This Utah Republican isn’t listening - AP News
PoliticsWhat Trump Cabinet departures signal about state of administration
Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer's resignation marks the third Cabinet member to leave the Trump administration over the past two months. Political strategists Kevin Sheridan and Adam Greene join with analysis.
PoliticsMajority Backs Trump Impeachment—Even One in Five of His Own Voters
A majority of American adults say that the US House should vote to impeach President Trump—including one-in-five people who voted for him in 2024. A new poll by Strength in Numbers, a data-based news website, and the market research platform Verasight found that 55 percent of respondents said they support the US House voting for […]
Why was the Southern Poverty Law Center indicted on federal fraud charges?
<p>Charges alleged the center paid informants to infiltrate extremist groups without disclosing payments to donors</p><p>The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted on Tuesday on federal fraud charges, alleging it improperly paid informants to infiltrate extremist groups without disclosing the payments to donors, acting attorney general Todd Blanche said.</p><p>The center’s CEO Bryan Fair said the payments went to confidential informants in order to monitor threats of violence from the extremist groups – and that the information the center received was frequently shared with the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. The information gathered by the informants helped save lives, Fair said on Tuesday.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/21/splc-fraud-charges-explained">Continue reading...</a>
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
Report: Merck’s blockbuster cancer drug topped $200,000 a year under Trump
One in three Americans forced to make financial sacrifices for health coverage
US Live Nation and Ticketmaster verdict triggers calls for Australian investigation into ticketing rules
Welcome to the Second Gilded Age
Steve Bannon sides with Anthropic in fight with Pentagon: ‘It’s almost too dangerous’
