DOJ says Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
DOJ argues Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional, saying President Trump need not comply with it.
How This Affects You
If accepted, this legal position could allow the White House to destroy or withhold presidential records without Congressional oversight, undermining transparency laws that affect public access to government documents.
AI Summary
The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel has concluded that the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional, effectively relieving President Trump of any obligation to comply with the law. The OLC opinion, an internal executive branch legal guidance, argues that the statute conflicts with presidential authority under the Constitution. The Presidential Records Act, enacted in 1978 following Watergate, requires presidents to preserve official records and hand them over to the National Archives upon leaving office. This legal position could have sweeping implications for document preservation and congressional oversight, as it suggests the administration believes a sitting president has broad discretion over what constitutes presidential records. The move echoes Trump's long-running disputes over classified documents and records handling, which have been central to multiple investigations and legal proceedings.
What's Being Done
The Office of Legal Counsel within the DOJ issued an opinion asserting the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional.
This article is part of a story we're tracking:
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
Government TransparencyDOJ concludes presidential records requirement unconstitutional
A federal law requiring presidents to preserve and hand over presidential records to the government at the conclusion of their term is unconstitutional, according to a legally nonbinding Justice Department opinion. The 52-page opinion, first reported by Axios, found that the Presidential Records Act of 1978 exceeds congressional authority and “unconstitutionally intrudes on the…
Government TransparencyExclusive: Trump's DOJ says he's not required to turn over official records
<p><a href="https://www.axios.com/politics-policy/donald-trump" target="_blank">President Trump</a>'s Justice Department has concluded that a federal law requiring presidential records to be turned over to the government is unconstitutional, a senior White House official tells Axios.</p><p><strong>Why it matters: </strong>The finding is an indication Trump will be reluctant to give all of his official records to the National Archives at the end of his term, as presidents have done for nearly a half-century under the <a href="https://www.axios.com/2022/08/09/trump-presidential-records-fbi-warrant" target="_blank">Presidential Records Act</a> of 1978.</p><hr><ul><li>The law, passed in the post-Watergate era as a hedge against government corruption, states that every official record regarding a president's decisions or policies belongs to the U.S. government, not the president.</li></ul><p><strong>Trump has shown </strong>that he disagrees with the law.</p><ul><li>When he left office i...
Government TransparencyJustice Dept. says the Presidential Records Act is ‘unconstitutional’ - The Washington Post
Government TransparencyNASA Partially Lifts Redactions in James Webb Briefing Records Following Appeal
A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case involving congressional briefings on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has yielded additional records following a successful appeal, but the newly released material continues to be heavily redacted, leaving key portions of the briefing content concealed. The case, labeled as 25-00860-F-HQ, stems from a September 22, 2024, FOIA [...] The post NASA Partially Lifts Redactions in James Webb Briefing Records Following Appeal first appeared on The Black Vault .
PoliticsRFK Jr. May Reverse a Peptide Ban He Calls “Illegal.” Former FDA Officials Say He Mischaracterized Their Work.
The post RFK Jr. May Reverse a Peptide Ban He Calls “Illegal.” Former FDA Officials Say He Mischaracterized Their Work. appeared first on ProPublica .
Civil RightsThe Mississippi Department of Public Safety uncovers rare KKK artifacts in one of its offices - AP News
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMipwFBVV95cUxOY2JiNTAwMi1DYVVXNzVUMmphdWJFcHduZnNUSmkxem54cGxVVXNKVm9FSGNZWnd2cVVsaEVnRGxmN2g2bHlfUmNkMlhBSVhxZW10WWJHaTZFSlZ1ZVVJSE5VUFBEOXEyaTlfMGN3RkcyZmZxRmUwLVdfNVNxdlNYeWJVMnlkeHpzUk9CRzFIWHd6ZnlJeWVRWk11OWRFd05IY3E0LXJVWQ?oc=5" target="_blank">The Mississippi Department of Public Safety uncovers rare KKK artifacts in one of its offices</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>
Trump's VA killed a home loan program. Vets are now losing their homes because of it
Foreclosures on VA loans are at their highest level in a decade. VA has a fix but it is months away and could still leave vets worse off than most other homeowners.
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
'The gravest crime against humanity': What does the UN vote on slavery mean?
After 16 years and $8 billion, the military's new GPS software still doesn't work
US paves way for private assets to be included in 401(k) retirement plans - Reuters
The Justice Department plans to share sensitive voter data with Homeland Security
Trump administration scales back on asylum crackdown, sources say
