Sonia Sotomayor apologizes to Brett Kavanaugh in US supreme court justice spat
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor apologized to Justice Brett Kavanaugh for criticizing his ruling on ICE raids.
How This Affects You
This public apology highlights divisions within the Supreme Court, which can affect the perception of judicial impartiality and the court's direction on high-profile cases.
AI Summary
US Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor apologized to fellow Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday following her public criticism of his dissenting ruling on ICE raids. Sotomayor had previously criticized Kavanaugh at an event last week for an opinion he wrote in September concurring with the court's decision supporting roving immigration raids in California. This public apology is an unusual event, highlighting the ongoing divisions within the Supreme Court regarding its direction and rulings on high-profile cases. Kavanaugh is part of the court's conservative majority, while Sotomayor belongs to its liberal bloc.
Source Coverage Map
6 of 43 tracked sources covered this story
Following this story?
Get notified when new coverage appears
Other Sources Covering This Story
5 sourcesMultiple outlets have reported on this story. Compare perspectives from different sources.
Justice Sotomayor issues rare apology for remarks about conservative colleague - The Washington Post
Justice Sotomayor apologizes to Kavanaugh for public criticism of immigration opinion
This article is part of a story we're tracking:
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
PoliticsSonia Sotomayor apologizes for criticizing Brett Kavanaugh over ICE ruling
Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has apologized for publicly criticizing her colleague, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, over a recent ruling on immigration stops. CBS News legal reporter Katrina Kaufman has more.
PoliticsSCOTUS justices air disputes in rare public rifts
<p><a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/01/01/2026-trump-supreme-court-cases-tariffs" target="_blank">Supreme Court</a> justices are trading barbs over the court's direction, breaking from their usually private and civil decorum.</p><p><strong>Why it matters:</strong> The recent remarks have offered a rare public display of the deep <a href="https://www.axios.com/2024/03/14/supreme-court-civility-amy-coney-barrett-sonia-sotomayor" target="_blank">ideological divides</a> within the most secretive branch of the U.S. government.</p><hr><ul><li>The fracture's timing is extraordinary since "this is the time of year, traditionally, when the court is putting the finishing touches on its biggest, and these days, most divisive, rulings," Georgetown law professor Stephen Vladeck tells Axios. </li><li>The conservative-majority court still has to decide on landmark cases involving <a href="https://www.npr.org/2025/10/15/nx-s1-5575101/scotus-voting-rights-arguments" target="_blank">voting rights<...
PoliticsJustice Jackson chides Supreme Court conservatives over 'oblivious' pro-Trump emergency orders - AP News
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiuwFBVV95cUxPSmh3bjRzUnc2ZS1wb19KQ3d1eUtfTS1KX1M1anctNDVhSWo3aF83NWNpOXRJV2hiYmc3aEgzUkNxekJmSlJfVlN4UVg4VTQ3M0txVDVfRld2NnI4S3hpZGZNX01ZRjhyeHFOZ29nTW9SeDQ5RkdBSVlpNHlSeklMbVFDX3YybkkzQnN3dHZ3SC1tUzBxR3JiSm1FVGdrUmQ3RFFPNUtjZkhXczlqNlJhaklXZEtJUlJPYVpn?oc=5" target="_blank">Justice Jackson chides Supreme Court conservatives over 'oblivious' pro-Trump emergency orders</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>
CorporateStakes high as supreme court set to rule on law involving Monsanto’s weed-killing pesticide
<p>Risks from cancer and other diseases could be hidden with little accountability if justices favor big firms, critics warn</p><p>The US could face foreign attacks, food shortages and agricultural “devastation” if the supreme court rules against Monsanto in a closely watched case over pesticide regulation that is set for arguments later this month, according to a series of legal briefs supporting the company.</p><p>In contrast, opposing legal briefs warn that if the court sides with Monsanto, consumers will be stripped of their rights to sue when they develop cancer or other serious diseases they attribute to exposure to dangerous chemicals. Companies will be able to hide product risks with little accountability, they warn.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/16/supreme-court-monsanto-glyphosate">Continue reading...</a>
PoliticsSenate Republicans hope Supreme Court ‘surprise’ could help save majority
Senate Republicans who fear their three-seat majority could be in danger in this year’s midterm election would welcome the retirement of conservative Justice Samuel Alito as an “October surprise” that could change their political fortunes by rallying GOP-leaning voters to the polls. GOP senators are being careful not to prod Alito, a leading conservative voice…
EnvironmentSupreme Court rules for Michigan in its fight to shut down an aging energy pipeline
The Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with Michigan in ruling that the state's lawsuit seeking to shut down a section of an aging pipeline beneath a Great Lakes channel will stay in state court.
Inside Linda McMahon's effort to dismantle the Department of Education
A former pro-wrestling executive, McMahon is now the education secretary Trump tasked with abolishing the agency. <em>New Yorker</em> writer Zach Helfand explains how her WWE experience led her to this role.
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
Report: Merck’s blockbuster cancer drug topped $200,000 a year under Trump
One in three Americans forced to make financial sacrifices for health coverage
US Live Nation and Ticketmaster verdict triggers calls for Australian investigation into ticketing rules
Welcome to the Second Gilded Age
Steve Bannon sides with Anthropic in fight with Pentagon: ‘It’s almost too dangerous’
