Supreme Court appears skeptical of Trump’s bid to end birthright citizenship - politico.com
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
Supreme Court doubts Trump can eliminate birthright citizenship through executive action alone.
How This Affects You
Millions of children born to undocumented immigrants could lose or retain automatic U.S. citizenship depending on the Court's ruling.
AI Summary
The Supreme Court appeared skeptical during oral arguments of the Trump administration's effort to eliminate birthright citizenship through executive action, with several justices questioning the legal basis for such a sweeping change. The administration argues the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause doesn't automatically grant citizenship to children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, but multiple justices expressed concern about circumventing the amendment without legislative action. A ruling against the administration would preserve the century-old constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship; a ruling in favor would represent a historic shift in immigration law and the scope of presidential power. The case tests whether the president can reinterpret a constitutional amendment unilaterally or whether Congress must act to change citizenship law. The Court's decision, expected by late June, will likely determine whether millions of children born to undocumented immigrants retain automatic U.S. citizenship.
What's Being Done
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments; a decision is expected by late June.
Source Coverage Map
18 of 43 tracked sources covered this story
Following this story?
Get notified when new coverage appears
Other Sources Covering This Story
5 sourcesMultiple outlets have reported on this story. Compare perspectives from different sources.

Trump attends birthright citizenship hearing at Supreme Court in historic first

Trump seeks to redefine who gets to be an American with birthright citizenship case
This article is part of a story we're tracking:
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
PoliticsWhispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments
President Donald Trump has attended oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, marking a first for a sitting president.
PoliticsWhispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments - apnews.com
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMitAFBVV95cUxQS0wxYkU3RVRReVBuRDFmU25xSWdMWTd4M043TXBlbVJnLVJrTkI4Nmg0YkNMOXNZQklEX0k4ZUpTSHBOUXphMGxzSlR4MXRzU19OUktmb0lGb3Fjekk4aWhQYlc1Y3B3dTBXQVhQZE1KNjZUQVNhOVdFVWxFLXRlMnpQNmprQzF4MGlwbEp6MVRBUmVyNTZzTDNMNnprWUtXbXl2bmdobGpXZnlrbVpJVkkwTXo?oc=5" target="_blank">Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">apnews.com</font>
Civil RightsIn Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwwFBVV95cUxQa1BRbnZXSXhWZ1o3SVU4eEdNRktQMnBxLWMxSDQ3ekNwNFlfeHFEZllleVFhZHZGTmdlRFVoZVpzbzNlSnJuZ2o4S2lPUTlDdHRISFRlbjNBOU5BSlAzbFNjT0dwa05WVEltZy1WOHpybXV0OVI1cGpvMlRoY3VfeWdpYkhWUEtGX3RpVVJ2RklMMTAzTEQwZm51YVdMQnJIUERsZmkyVlMzamU5dXYwS2J2a3FRV19xbGJpMklmYmdMR1U?oc=5" target="_blank">In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>
PoliticsAs birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.
Civil RightsTrump’s order on birthright citizenship would harm millions, including citizens
On April 1, the Supreme Court will hear arguments on one of the most consequential immigration cases in decades. At issue is whether President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship can stand. The stakes could not be higher. If the court sides with Trump, the damage will ripple far beyond undocumented immigrants. It will affect legal visa…
PoliticsTrump’s Maha agenda stalled as top CDC and surgeon general roles sit empty
<p>Trump has yet to nominate a permanent CDC director and the Senate confirmation of his pick for top doctor is in limbo</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/news/2026/feb/17/sign-up-for-the-breaking-news-us-email-to-get-newsletter-alerts-direct-to-your-inbox?utm_medium=ACQUISITIONS_STANDFIRST&utm_campaign=BN22326&utm_content=signup&utm_term=standfirst&utm_source=GUARDIAN_WEB">Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox</a></p></li></ul><p>The Trump administration’s “Make America healthy again” (Maha) agenda appears to be stalled as two of the government’s most influential public health positions sit empty.</p><p>The president has yet to nominate a permanent director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), leaving a leaderless agency that has been plagued by turmoil for the past year. At the same time, Trump’s controversial pick for surgeon general, Casey Means, remains in limbo as her nomination stall...

Trump says he is strongly considering pulling US out of NATO in interview with UK's Telegraph
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
'The gravest crime against humanity': What does the UN vote on slavery mean?

At Pentagon Christian service, Hegseth prays for violence 'against those who deserve no mercy'

US paves way for private assets to be included in 401(k) retirement plans - Reuters

After 16 years and $8 billion, the military's new GPS software still doesn't work

Army extends maximum recruitment age to 42, allowing older recruits to join




