Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music - The New York Times

The New York Times
March 25, 2026
3 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

The Supreme Court ruled that internet service providers cannot be held liable for users' pirated music downloads, narrowing copyright holders' enforcement options.

AI Summary

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of an internet service provider in a copyright dispute involving pirated music, rejecting arguments that ISPs should be held liable for users' infringing activity on their networks. The case centered on whether internet providers bear responsibility for facilitating copyright violations when subscribers use their services to download or stream unauthorized content. The decision narrows the legal exposure of ISPs and limits copyright holders' ability to pursue internet providers as defendants in infringement cases. The ruling reflects the Court's interpretation of existing copyright law regarding secondary liability—the question of who is responsible when a third party enables or profits from someone else's violation. Music and entertainment industry groups had sought broader ISP accountability, while internet providers argued they should not be held liable simply for providing the infrastructure that others misuse.

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

Supreme Court sides with internet provider in dispute over pirated music
Corporate

Supreme Court sides with internet provider in dispute over pirated music

The Supreme Court ruled that internet service provider Cox Communications cannot be held liable for copyright infringement by its subscribers.

CBS NewsMar 25
Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music
Corporate

Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music

Leading music labels sued Cox Communications for failing to terminate accounts of subscribers flagged for distributing copyrighted music.

New York TimesMar 25
Supreme Court sides with Cox in copyright battle with record labels
Corporate

Supreme Court sides with Cox in copyright battle with record labels

The Supreme Court has sided with internet service provider Cox Communications in its copyright fight with record labels over illegal music downloads.

PBS NewsHourMar 25
US Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music - Reuters
Corporate

US Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMixgFBVV95cUxPenJwdmpCQzNoWDFnekVRcDBrU29hb3ZQLVJyb0NfQVZYY2VYYk9BbGJ0TWhpYXV4SExTcDlfU3ZDLVlFZmZFaXBjNS1lMXI4dTM2eEZlQVU3ektXXzVJbThwWll3NTZjRk9WS08xTXlsMlRVRkhHQk84S3U2NnZTdTlsSnFWNTdLaVdUYVB6S3hHbGJzejlXbWRnS1VWOGU0QUNZeVRBOHpONEV5N1lqNmtzdnBkbGVadHk0SFR3RkRxZTMtSWc?oc=5" target="_blank">US Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 25
Supreme Court rules for Cox in Sony copyright fight over music downloads
Corporate

Supreme Court rules for Cox in Sony copyright fight over music downloads

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that Sony cannot hold Cox Communications liable for not doing enough to disconnect customers who illegally downloaded copyrighted music, a battle that has sent ripples through the music and telecommunications industries.   Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, said a lower court got it wrong in putting Cox on the hook for damages…

The HillMar 25
'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today
Politics

'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiugFBVV95cUxPNTlzai1Eci1uTnZCRVVZRFluN2gxQ2tYUkQwTHhDWHhwM0JHVVhGTGtEQktmNjNWdjdmUHJtSUhZTEVqcjg5ZWhHS2ZPdnVQRXNCTW5neERMd0ZtOTdjbnFHYXlLcVk1RVlfXzJCektyZzVUMEpYdy04ZDhkN0tCOVhOR3hVWjlBMm5TVGd5Qkd3ODBVQmZWMUZ5Z0t4V05mSVBCbk4wYm9wdU5Fc0NFTkVmb2g1M2VBU3c?oc=5" target="_blank">'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">USA Today</font>

USA TodayMar 24
Read Next
Instagram and YouTube found liable in landmark social media addiction trial in California
Technology

Instagram and YouTube found liable in landmark social media addiction trial in California

A jury found both Meta and YouTube liable in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit that aimed to hold social media platforms responsible for harm to children using their services.

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources