Supreme Court sides with internet provider in dispute over pirated music

CBS News
March 25, 2026
3 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

The Supreme Court ruled internet providers cannot be held liable when users illegally download or share copyrighted material on their networks.

How This Affects You

This ruling may allow your ISP to avoid responsibility for piracy on its network, potentially leading entertainment companies to pursue individual users more aggressively for copyright violations.

AI Summary

The Supreme Court ruled that internet service provider Cox Communications cannot be held liable for copyright infringement committed by its subscribers over its network. The decision addresses a longstanding legal question about whether ISPs bear responsibility when users illegally download or share copyrighted material through their services. The ruling potentially limits the copyright industry's ability to pursue damages against internet providers, shifting enforcement focus back toward individual infringers rather than the infrastructure companies that facilitate access. Copyright holders, including music labels and film studios, had argued that ISPs should face liability when they fail to adequately police piracy on their networks or disconnect repeat offenders. The decision could reshape how the music and entertainment industries approach digital piracy enforcement.

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music
Corporate

Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music

Leading music labels sued Cox Communications for failing to terminate accounts of subscribers flagged for distributing copyrighted music.

New York TimesMar 25
Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music - The New York Times
Technology

Supreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music - The New York Times

The New York TimesMar 25
US Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music - Reuters
Corporate

US Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMixgFBVV95cUxPenJwdmpCQzNoWDFnekVRcDBrU29hb3ZQLVJyb0NfQVZYY2VYYk9BbGJ0TWhpYXV4SExTcDlfU3ZDLVlFZmZFaXBjNS1lMXI4dTM2eEZlQVU3ektXXzVJbThwWll3NTZjRk9WS08xTXlsMlRVRkhHQk84S3U2NnZTdTlsSnFWNTdLaVdUYVB6S3hHbGJzejlXbWRnS1VWOGU0QUNZeVRBOHpONEV5N1lqNmtzdnBkbGVadHk0SFR3RkRxZTMtSWc?oc=5" target="_blank">US Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 25
Supreme Court sides with Cox in copyright battle with record labels
Corporate

Supreme Court sides with Cox in copyright battle with record labels

The Supreme Court has sided with internet service provider Cox Communications in its copyright fight with record labels over illegal music downloads.

PBS NewsHourMar 25
Supreme Court rules for Cox in Sony copyright fight over music downloads
Corporate

Supreme Court rules for Cox in Sony copyright fight over music downloads

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that Sony cannot hold Cox Communications liable for not doing enough to disconnect customers who illegally downloaded copyrighted music, a battle that has sent ripples through the music and telecommunications industries.   Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, said a lower court got it wrong in putting Cox on the hook for damages…

The HillMar 25
'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today
Politics

'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiugFBVV95cUxPNTlzai1Eci1uTnZCRVVZRFluN2gxQ2tYUkQwTHhDWHhwM0JHVVhGTGtEQktmNjNWdjdmUHJtSUhZTEVqcjg5ZWhHS2ZPdnVQRXNCTW5neERMd0ZtOTdjbnFHYXlLcVk1RVlfXzJCektyZzVUMEpYdy04ZDhkN0tCOVhOR3hVWjlBMm5TVGd5Qkd3ODBVQmZWMUZ5Z0t4V05mSVBCbk4wYm9wdU5Fc0NFTkVmb2g1M2VBU3c?oc=5" target="_blank">'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">USA Today</font>

USA TodayMar 24
Read Next
Jury orders Meta and Google to pay woman $6 million in social media addiction trial
Corporate

Jury orders Meta and Google to pay woman $6 million in social media addiction trial

The verdict marks the end of<strong> </strong>the first-ever jury trial<strong> </strong>over whether tech giants should be held accountable for social media addiction. It may influence the outcome of 2,000 other pending lawsuits.

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources