US Supreme Court rules against ban on 'conversion therapy' for LGBTQ minors

AFP / France 24
by FRANCE24
April 1, 2026
4 views
3 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

Supreme Court rules Colorado's ban on conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors violates free speech, overturning the state's protection law.

AI Summary

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Colorado's 2019 ban on "conversion therapy" for LGBTQ minors violates free speech protections, rejecting the state's effort to restrict the discredited practice on constitutional grounds. A Christian therapist challenged the law, arguing it infringed on practitioners' right to express therapeutic views, and the Court sided with that argument despite the practice being opposed by major medical organizations. The decision potentially undermines similar bans in other states that have sought to protect minors from the harmful pseudoscientific treatment aimed at changing sexual orientation or gender identity. Colorado's law had prohibited licensed therapists from conducting the practice on patients under 18, making it one of the earliest protections of its kind. The ruling signals the Court's skepticism toward content-based restrictions on professional speech, even when states argue they serve a protective purpose for vulnerable populations.

What's Being Done

The Supreme Court ruled against the ban; other states with similar laws may face legal challenges based on this precedent.

Source Coverage Map

14 of 43 tracked sources covered this story

33% coverage
Did Not Cover (29)
ICIJ97AP World News96AP News96AP US News96AP Top News96+24 more

Following this story?

Get notified when new coverage appears

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?
Civil Rights

US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?

<p>The court ruled 8-1 against a Colorado law banning ‘conversion therapy’ for youth. What does it mean for other states, and why did two liberals side with conservatives?</p><p>The US supreme court ruled 8-1 this week against a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy” for youth, in a case that could have major consequences for transgender and queer youth across the US, and for healthcare more broadly.</p><p>Colorado’s 2019 <a href="https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2019a_1129_signed.pdf">law</a> prohibits licensed clinicians from seeking to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of youth patients under 18. It is <a href="https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/conversion_therapy">one of 23 states</a> with similar restrictions.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-ruling-impact-meaning">Continue reading...</a>

The Guardian US NewsApr 2
As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it
Politics

As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.

NPRMar 30
Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico
Civil Rights

Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAFBVV95cUxNV3ZPZWlfWTNxN3FXLWRDd1l0ZnRWVVVENVR3WExVRE9pbGo4VVdrZU92bllWTjA4d05LRmZyZThsRVJHODNHVFVKUHh2QkQtT3ZYeF9YdnZLdThUUjBISk5odlRQdE16a3pwSDhJbjkzRWFmMTN6X3RmSEhPM1dWc05xZEtISU9Ba3NYU2lGSFN4cTNzYk1ocW9tVlE?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Politico</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2lLbXBibEVCRmR4NzlKdWRGT1FpZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>

PoliticoMar 29
In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters
Civil Rights

In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwwFBVV95cUxQa1BRbnZXSXhWZ1o3SVU4eEdNRktQMnBxLWMxSDQ3ekNwNFlfeHFEZllleVFhZHZGTmdlRFVoZVpzbzNlSnJuZ2o4S2lPUTlDdHRISFRlbjNBOU5BSlAzbFNjT0dwa05WVEltZy1WOHpybXV0OVI1cGpvMlRoY3VfeWdpYkhWUEtGX3RpVVJ2RklMMTAzTEQwZm51YVdMQnJIUERsZmkyVlMzamU5dXYwS2J2a3FRV19xbGJpMklmYmdMR1U?oc=5" target="_blank">In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 29
Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News
Civil Rights

Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirAFBVV95cUxNUFBCX2dpMjY0b05kTDRsdUNVTVhGVGtVV0JpU2NBd3c3MGNKenk0TDVnYjVreHBocFhTV3RIVmF3UV8yUnY3NXNXN1pYQm9hbTRER2x4eVF0T183RmFRRk5reHhxcG1ISWtTYVlsMHNjVGpXM3lVd1ZNazk2YllNUEdRS1ZjUEpyUndsWFVBTlUyMncxNzVFSVQ1TngwNkNHbk5NdWhGcml2OWVW?oc=5" target="_blank">Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>

AP NewsMar 29
Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments
Politics

Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments

President Donald Trump has attended oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, marking a first for a sitting president.

PBS NewsHourApr 1
Read Next
Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo as U.S. orders them to countries they've never been to
Civil Rights

Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo as U.S. orders them to countries they've never been to

More than 13,000 immigrants who were living legally in the U.S., waiting for rulings on asylum claims, have faced so-called third-country deportation orders, destined for countries where most had no ties, according to the nonprofit group Mobile Pathways.

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources