On Trans Day of Visibility, Supreme Court Sides With Conversion Therapy

Mother Jones
by Katie Herchenroeder and Madison Pauly
March 31, 2026
4 views
5 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

Supreme Court ruled conversion therapy bans violate free speech, threatening protections in 23 states.

How This Affects You

If you have a transgender or gay child, they may now be subjected to conversion therapy in states that lose their bans, despite medical organizations documenting psychological harm from the practice.

AI Summary

The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 on Tuesday in *Chiles v. Salazar* that Colorado's ban on conversion therapy violates the First Amendment, with Justice Neil Gorsuch's majority opinion treating the practice as a matter of protected speech rather than medical regulation. Christian counselor Kaley Chiles, represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, successfully argued that her talk-therapy approach to changing sexual orientation or gender identity cannot be restricted as speech censorship, despite the American Psychological Association and federal health agencies having declared conversion therapy both ineffective and harmful to minors. The ruling, handed down on Transgender Day of Visibility, threatens to overturn similar protections in 23 states and comes as the Trump administration has supported rolling back transgender protections across federal policy. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's sole dissent argued the law regulated medical treatment, not speech, and did not prevent Chiles from expressing any viewpoint outside therapy sessions. Advocates like the National Center for LGBTQ Rights said they will pursue alternative legal remedies through malpractice claims and licensing board discipline.

What's Being Done

LGBTQ+ advocates plan to pursue alternative legal remedies through malpractice claims and licensing board discipline.

Source Coverage Map

14 of 43 tracked sources covered this story

Overlooked Story
33% coverage
Did Not Cover (29)
ICIJ97AP World News96AP News96AP US News96AP Top News96+24 more

Following this story?

Get notified when new coverage appears

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?
Civil Rights

US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?

<p>The court ruled 8-1 against a Colorado law banning ‘conversion therapy’ for youth. What does it mean for other states, and why did two liberals side with conservatives?</p><p>The US supreme court ruled 8-1 this week against a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy” for youth, in a case that could have major consequences for transgender and queer youth across the US, and for healthcare more broadly.</p><p>Colorado’s 2019 <a href="https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2019a_1129_signed.pdf">law</a> prohibits licensed clinicians from seeking to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of youth patients under 18. It is <a href="https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/conversion_therapy">one of 23 states</a> with similar restrictions.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-ruling-impact-meaning">Continue reading...</a>

The Guardian US NewsApr 2
Supreme Court mulls limiting mail-in ballots, forcing states to prepare for changes
Politics

Supreme Court mulls limiting mail-in ballots, forcing states to prepare for changes

States are already preparing for the possibility that the Supreme Court could eliminate grace periods for mail-in ballots received after Election Day, which could pose unexpected consequences for this year’s midterm elections and beyond. The high court on Monday weighed the lawfulness of a Mississippi statute that allows ballots postmarked by Election Day but received five business days afterward to still be counted. More than a dozen states…

The HillMar 28
Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico
Civil Rights

Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAFBVV95cUxNV3ZPZWlfWTNxN3FXLWRDd1l0ZnRWVVVENVR3WExVRE9pbGo4VVdrZU92bllWTjA4d05LRmZyZThsRVJHODNHVFVKUHh2QkQtT3ZYeF9YdnZLdThUUjBISk5odlRQdE16a3pwSDhJbjkzRWFmMTN6X3RmSEhPM1dWc05xZEtISU9Ba3NYU2lGSFN4cTNzYk1ocW9tVlE?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Politico</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2lLbXBibEVCRmR4NzlKdWRGT1FpZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>

PoliticoMar 29
In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters
Civil Rights

In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwwFBVV95cUxQa1BRbnZXSXhWZ1o3SVU4eEdNRktQMnBxLWMxSDQ3ekNwNFlfeHFEZllleVFhZHZGTmdlRFVoZVpzbzNlSnJuZ2o4S2lPUTlDdHRISFRlbjNBOU5BSlAzbFNjT0dwa05WVEltZy1WOHpybXV0OVI1cGpvMlRoY3VfeWdpYkhWUEtGX3RpVVJ2RklMMTAzTEQwZm51YVdMQnJIUERsZmkyVlMzamU5dXYwS2J2a3FRV19xbGJpMklmYmdMR1U?oc=5" target="_blank">In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 29
Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News
Civil Rights

Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirAFBVV95cUxNUFBCX2dpMjY0b05kTDRsdUNVTVhGVGtVV0JpU2NBd3c3MGNKenk0TDVnYjVreHBocFhTV3RIVmF3UV8yUnY3NXNXN1pYQm9hbTRER2x4eVF0T183RmFRRk5reHhxcG1ISWtTYVlsMHNjVGpXM3lVd1ZNazk2YllNUEdRS1ZjUEpyUndsWFVBTlUyMncxNzVFSVQ1TngwNkNHbk5NdWhGcml2OWVW?oc=5" target="_blank">Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>

AP NewsMar 29
As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it
Politics

As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.

NPRMar 30
Read Next
Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo as U.S. orders them to countries they've never been to
Civil Rights

Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo as U.S. orders them to countries they've never been to

More than 13,000 immigrants who were living legally in the U.S., waiting for rulings on asylum claims, have faced so-called third-country deportation orders, destined for countries where most had no ties, according to the nonprofit group Mobile Pathways.

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources