On Trans Day of Visibility, Supreme Court Sides With Conversion Therapy
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
Supreme Court ruled conversion therapy bans violate free speech, threatening protections in 23 states.
How This Affects You
If you have a transgender or gay child, they may now be subjected to conversion therapy in states that lose their bans, despite medical organizations documenting psychological harm from the practice.
AI Summary
The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 on Tuesday in *Chiles v. Salazar* that Colorado's ban on conversion therapy violates the First Amendment, with Justice Neil Gorsuch's majority opinion treating the practice as a matter of protected speech rather than medical regulation. Christian counselor Kaley Chiles, represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, successfully argued that her talk-therapy approach to changing sexual orientation or gender identity cannot be restricted as speech censorship, despite the American Psychological Association and federal health agencies having declared conversion therapy both ineffective and harmful to minors. The ruling, handed down on Transgender Day of Visibility, threatens to overturn similar protections in 23 states and comes as the Trump administration has supported rolling back transgender protections across federal policy. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's sole dissent argued the law regulated medical treatment, not speech, and did not prevent Chiles from expressing any viewpoint outside therapy sessions. Advocates like the National Center for LGBTQ Rights said they will pursue alternative legal remedies through malpractice claims and licensing board discipline.
What's Being Done
LGBTQ+ advocates plan to pursue alternative legal remedies through malpractice claims and licensing board discipline.
Source Coverage Map
14 of 43 tracked sources covered this story
Following this story?
Get notified when new coverage appears
Other Sources Covering This Story
5 sourcesMultiple outlets have reported on this story. Compare perspectives from different sources.

Tennessee librarian fired for refusing to move LGBTQ books from children’s to adult section

US Supreme Court rules against ban on 'conversion therapy' for LGBTQ minors

Conversion Therapy Gets Speech Protections — But Trans Kids’ Existence Gets No Protection At All

Supreme Court sides with therapist challenging Colorado ban on conversion therapy
This article is part of a story we're tracking:
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
Civil RightsUS supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?
<p>The court ruled 8-1 against a Colorado law banning ‘conversion therapy’ for youth. What does it mean for other states, and why did two liberals side with conservatives?</p><p>The US supreme court ruled 8-1 this week against a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy” for youth, in a case that could have major consequences for transgender and queer youth across the US, and for healthcare more broadly.</p><p>Colorado’s 2019 <a href="https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2019a_1129_signed.pdf">law</a> prohibits licensed clinicians from seeking to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of youth patients under 18. It is <a href="https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/conversion_therapy">one of 23 states</a> with similar restrictions.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-ruling-impact-meaning">Continue reading...</a>
PoliticsSupreme Court mulls limiting mail-in ballots, forcing states to prepare for changes
States are already preparing for the possibility that the Supreme Court could eliminate grace periods for mail-in ballots received after Election Day, which could pose unexpected consequences for this year’s midterm elections and beyond. The high court on Monday weighed the lawfulness of a Mississippi statute that allows ballots postmarked by Election Day but received five business days afterward to still be counted. More than a dozen states…
Civil RightsSupreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAFBVV95cUxNV3ZPZWlfWTNxN3FXLWRDd1l0ZnRWVVVENVR3WExVRE9pbGo4VVdrZU92bllWTjA4d05LRmZyZThsRVJHODNHVFVKUHh2QkQtT3ZYeF9YdnZLdThUUjBISk5odlRQdE16a3pwSDhJbjkzRWFmMTN6X3RmSEhPM1dWc05xZEtISU9Ba3NYU2lGSFN4cTNzYk1ocW9tVlE?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Politico</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2lLbXBibEVCRmR4NzlKdWRGT1FpZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>
Civil RightsIn Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwwFBVV95cUxQa1BRbnZXSXhWZ1o3SVU4eEdNRktQMnBxLWMxSDQ3ekNwNFlfeHFEZllleVFhZHZGTmdlRFVoZVpzbzNlSnJuZ2o4S2lPUTlDdHRISFRlbjNBOU5BSlAzbFNjT0dwa05WVEltZy1WOHpybXV0OVI1cGpvMlRoY3VfeWdpYkhWUEtGX3RpVVJ2RklMMTAzTEQwZm51YVdMQnJIUERsZmkyVlMzamU5dXYwS2J2a3FRV19xbGJpMklmYmdMR1U?oc=5" target="_blank">In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>
Civil RightsSome familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup - AP News
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMirAFBVV95cUxNUFBCX2dpMjY0b05kTDRsdUNVTVhGVGtVV0JpU2NBd3c3MGNKenk0TDVnYjVreHBocFhTV3RIVmF3UV8yUnY3NXNXN1pYQm9hbTRER2x4eVF0T183RmFRRk5reHhxcG1ISWtTYVlsMHNjVGpXM3lVd1ZNazk2YllNUEdRS1ZjUEpyUndsWFVBTlUyMncxNzVFSVQ1TngwNkNHbk5NdWhGcml2OWVW?oc=5" target="_blank">Some familiar names to the Supreme Court in a death row case over racial bias in jury makeup</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">AP News</font>
PoliticsAs birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.

Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo as U.S. orders them to countries they've never been to
More than 13,000 immigrants who were living legally in the U.S., waiting for rulings on asylum claims, have faced so-called third-country deportation orders, destined for countries where most had no ties, according to the nonprofit group Mobile Pathways.
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
After 16 years and $8 billion, the military's new GPS software still doesn't work

US paves way for private assets to be included in 401(k) retirement plans - Reuters

Trump administration scales back on asylum crackdown, sources say

European nations warn over Israel’s planned expansion of death penalty

WTO talks near deal on reform roadmap amid US-India e-commerce deadlock - Reuters



