Supreme Court sides with Cox Communications in a copyright fight with record labels over downloads - AP News
Quick Insights
The Bottom Line
Supreme Court rules in favor of Cox Communications in copyright dispute with record labels over downloads.
How This Affects You
This ruling could affect internet service provider liability standards and potentially impact how ISPs handle copyright infringement by users.
AI Summary
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cox Communications in a copyright dispute with record labels, deciding the internet service provider is not liable for customers' infringing downloads. The case centered on whether Cox could be held responsible under copyright law for repeat infringers on its network and what obligations ISPs have to police user activity. The decision limits the legal exposure of broadband providers in copyright cases, shifting liability concerns away from internet companies toward individual users or other parties. Record labels had argued that Cox failed to adequately enforce its own repeat-infringer policy, but the Court disagreed with their interpretation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The ruling has broad implications for how ISPs manage copyright enforcement and could affect similar litigation involving other internet service providers.
Source Coverage Map
3 of 43 tracked sources covered this story
Following this story?
Get notified when new coverage appears
Other Sources Covering This Story
2 sourcesMultiple outlets have reported on this story. Compare perspectives from different sources.
Should this be getting more attention?
You Might Have Missed
Related stories from different sources and perspectives
CorporateSupreme Court rules for Cox in Sony copyright fight over music downloads
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled Wednesday that Sony cannot hold Cox Communications liable for not doing enough to disconnect customers who illegally downloaded copyrighted music, a battle that has sent ripples through the music and telecommunications industries. Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority, said a lower court got it wrong in putting Cox on the hook for damages…
CorporateUS Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music - Reuters
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMixgFBVV95cUxPenJwdmpCQzNoWDFnekVRcDBrU29hb3ZQLVJyb0NfQVZYY2VYYk9BbGJ0TWhpYXV4SExTcDlfU3ZDLVlFZmZFaXBjNS1lMXI4dTM2eEZlQVU3ektXXzVJbThwWll3NTZjRk9WS08xTXlsMlRVRkhHQk84S3U2NnZTdTlsSnFWNTdLaVdUYVB6S3hHbGJzejlXbWRnS1VWOGU0QUNZeVRBOHpONEV5N1lqNmtzdnBkbGVadHk0SFR3RkRxZTMtSWc?oc=5" target="_blank">US Supreme Court backs Cox in fight over pirated music</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>
CorporateSupreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music
Leading music labels sued Cox Communications for failing to terminate accounts of subscribers flagged for distributing copyrighted music.
CorporateSupreme Court sides with internet provider in dispute over pirated music
The Supreme Court ruled that internet service provider Cox Communications cannot be held liable for copyright infringement by its subscribers.
TechnologySupreme Court Sides With Internet Provider in Copyright Fight Over Pirated Music - The New York Times
Politics'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers - USA Today
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiugFBVV95cUxPNTlzai1Eci1uTnZCRVVZRFluN2gxQ2tYUkQwTHhDWHhwM0JHVVhGTGtEQktmNjNWdjdmUHJtSUhZTEVqcjg5ZWhHS2ZPdnVQRXNCTW5neERMd0ZtOTdjbnFHYXlLcVk1RVlfXzJCektyZzVUMEpYdy04ZDhkN0tCOVhOR3hVWjlBMm5TVGd5Qkd3ODBVQmZWMUZ5Z0t4V05mSVBCbk4wYm9wdU5Fc0NFTkVmb2g1M2VBU3c?oc=5" target="_blank">'We don't have an actual policy.' Supreme Court debates limits on asylum-seekers</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">USA Today</font>
US jury verdicts against Meta, Google tee up fight over tech liability shield - Reuters
<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMi5wFBVV95cUxPRGRYT1RoYzViNkRoYXVlNExqaWR1UjY1cEJiU0hDdmpUOFlBMGVFa3hzMzhBRGFwOWR0andINnhoNHh4WHBmVC03Yk5kcjBrSTQtR2tYSGFXQm5oMG95VEFQR1BCOEg3aTRzakdnaFlHenFUZ01HeGlxN3JKejZwREVZR192RFBKUi03LWhEbUpjVThvS3hUWUg5cW5XMGQybHlvb2gtTVhKR0tEYnZHM050UFRKckpUMF9fc2loZkE4WmpBLTc3NWY4a2ZpUkQwc05IemRfeHVvUUZKZUJBNTE0Z3hRRE0?oc=5" target="_blank">US jury verdicts against Meta, Google tee up fight over tech liability shield</a> <font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>
Did this story change how you see things?
Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.
The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.
See our sourcesMost Read This Week
Fentanyl found inside Barbies sold at Missouri discount store, police say
Senate deal reached to cap insulin costs
The West's historic snow drought could bring water shortages, wildfires
Washington ignores America's fiscal cliff
Iran built a vast camera network to control dissent. Israel used it to track targets, AP sources say
