Supreme Court strikes Colorado ban on conversion therapy - NPR

NPR
March 31, 2026
4 views
3 min read

Quick Insights

The Bottom Line

Supreme Court strikes down Colorado's ban on conversion therapy for minors, raising First Amendment questions.

How This Affects You

LGBTQ+ minors in Colorado and states with similar bans may lose legal protections against conversion therapy, which medical evidence shows causes psychological harm.

AI Summary

The Supreme Court has struck down Colorado's ban on conversion therapy, the practice of attempting to change someone's sexual orientation or gender identity through psychological intervention. The decision reverses a state law that prohibited licensed mental health professionals from providing such treatment to minors, marking a significant setback for LGBTQ+ advocates who view conversion therapy as harmful and ineffective. The ruling raises questions about how broadly states can regulate mental health practices when First Amendment speech protections are involved. Colorado had been among several states to enact such bans in recent years, citing medical evidence that the practices cause psychological harm and have no scientific basis. The decision could embolden legal challenges to similar conversion therapy bans in other states.

What's Being Done

The decision could embolden legal challenges to similar conversion therapy bans in other states.

Source Coverage Map

14 of 43 tracked sources covered this story

33% coverage
Did Not Cover (29)
ICIJ97AP World News96AP News96AP US News96AP Top News96+24 more

Following this story?

Get notified when new coverage appears

Should this be getting more attention?

You Might Have Missed

Related stories from different sources and perspectives

US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?
Civil Rights

US supreme court’s ‘conversion therapy’ ruling opens ‘can of worms’. What’s next?

<p>The court ruled 8-1 against a Colorado law banning ‘conversion therapy’ for youth. What does it mean for other states, and why did two liberals side with conservatives?</p><p>The US supreme court ruled 8-1 this week against a Colorado law banning “conversion therapy” for youth, in a case that could have major consequences for transgender and queer youth across the US, and for healthcare more broadly.</p><p>Colorado’s 2019 <a href="https://content.leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2019a_1129_signed.pdf">law</a> prohibits licensed clinicians from seeking to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of youth patients under 18. It is <a href="https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality-maps/conversion_therapy">one of 23 states</a> with similar restrictions.</p> <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/02/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-ruling-impact-meaning">Continue reading...</a>

The Guardian US NewsApr 2
Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments - apnews.com
Politics

Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments - apnews.com

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMitAFBVV95cUxQS0wxYkU3RVRReVBuRDFmU25xSWdMWTd4M043TXBlbVJnLVJrTkI4Nmg0YkNMOXNZQklEX0k4ZUpTSHBOUXphMGxzSlR4MXRzU19OUktmb0lGb3Fjekk4aWhQYlc1Y3B3dTBXQVhQZE1KNjZUQVNhOVdFVWxFLXRlMnpQNmprQzF4MGlwbEp6MVRBUmVyNTZzTDNMNnprWUtXbXl2bmdobGpXZnlrbVpJVkkwTXo?oc=5" target="_blank">Whispers in the Supreme Court as Trump takes a front-row seat for oral arguments</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">apnews.com</font>

apnews.comApr 1
Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico
Civil Rights

Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection - Politico

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAFBVV95cUxNV3ZPZWlfWTNxN3FXLWRDd1l0ZnRWVVVENVR3WExVRE9pbGo4VVdrZU92bllWTjA4d05LRmZyZThsRVJHODNHVFVKUHh2QkQtT3ZYeF9YdnZLdThUUjBISk5odlRQdE16a3pwSDhJbjkzRWFmMTN6X3RmSEhPM1dWc05xZEtISU9Ba3NYU2lGSFN4cTNzYk1ocW9tVlE?oc=5" target="_blank">Supreme Court to hear death row case concerning prosecutor with history of discriminatory juror selection</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Politico</font><strong><a href="https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2lLbXBibEVCRmR4NzlKdWRGT1FpZ0FQAQ?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en&oc=5" target="_blank">View Full Coverage on Google News</a></strong>

PoliticoMar 29
In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters
Civil Rights

In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898 - Reuters

<a href="https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiwwFBVV95cUxQa1BRbnZXSXhWZ1o3SVU4eEdNRktQMnBxLWMxSDQ3ekNwNFlfeHFEZllleVFhZHZGTmdlRFVoZVpzbzNlSnJuZ2o4S2lPUTlDdHRISFRlbjNBOU5BSlAzbFNjT0dwa05WVEltZy1WOHpybXV0OVI1cGpvMlRoY3VfeWdpYkhWUEtGX3RpVVJ2RklMMTAzTEQwZm51YVdMQnJIUERsZmkyVlMzamU5dXYwS2J2a3FRV19xbGJpMklmYmdMR1U?oc=5" target="_blank">In Supreme Court fight over birthright citizenship, a great-grandson hears echoes of 1898</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color="#6f6f6f">Reuters</font>

ReutersMar 29
Supreme Court mulls limiting mail-in ballots, forcing states to prepare for changes
Politics

Supreme Court mulls limiting mail-in ballots, forcing states to prepare for changes

States are already preparing for the possibility that the Supreme Court could eliminate grace periods for mail-in ballots received after Election Day, which could pose unexpected consequences for this year’s midterm elections and beyond. The high court on Monday weighed the lawfulness of a Mississippi statute that allows ballots postmarked by Election Day but received five business days afterward to still be counted. More than a dozen states…

The HillMar 28
As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it
Politics

As birthright citizenship goes to Supreme Court, here's how Americans feel about it

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.

NPRMar 30
Read Next
Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo as U.S. orders them to countries they've never been to
Civil Rights

Asylum-seekers stuck in limbo as U.S. orders them to countries they've never been to

More than 13,000 immigrants who were living legally in the U.S., waiting for rulings on asylum claims, have faced so-called third-country deportation orders, destined for countries where most had no ties, according to the nonprofit group Mobile Pathways.

Continue reading

Did this story change how you see things?

Stories like this only matter when people see them. Help us get verified journalism in front of more eyes.

Share this story

Get the daily digest

Save for later

The Verity Ledger curates verified investigative journalism from trusted sources only.

See our sources